Disgraced FBI lawyer Lisa Page, best known for having sex with a married co-worker, and abusing the power of her office to assist Hillary Clinton in the 2016 Presidential election, has recently come out of hiding. She sought to defend what remains of her name, from what she laughably sees as unfair attacks on her by the President of the United States.
The first hint that she is every bit as bad as you think she is, comes from the publication carrying the interview.
The Daily Beast, which is, in reality, little more than an Antifa blog.
Page is obviously somebody that almost any media outlet would love to speak with. She could have had a softball interview with glowing commentary from the New York Times, the Washington Post, or any other newspaper. She could have gone live on CNN or MSNBC, and been treated as a hero for her assaults on marriage, democracy, and the rule of law. She chose the Daily Beast, specifically, for their low journalistic standards, and what one might safely bet was an established agreement to ask absolutely zero difficult questions.
Instead of asking Page anything meaningful, Molly Jong-Fast spends all 3500+ words assuring the reader that this FBI lawyer could not possibly have done anything even remotely suspicious, let alone illegal. The real problem is that conspiracy theorist in the White House, and the “harassment” Page has suffered for no other reason than being a woman. It almost goes without saying, that they blamed Russia for the scandal, and adamantly denied that Ukraine could possibly have made the slightest effort to impact the 2016 election.
Speaking of Ukraine, their human resources director, Joe Biden, is traveling about Iowa on a “No Malarkey” tour. Given what we know about Joe Biden, we can be quite certain that “malarkey” would be a rather charitable term to describe whatever nonsense he is feeding Iowa caucus goers. Perhaps he’ll host a town hall meeting with MS-13 members, and introduce them as a “courageous group of Americans“.
I suppose, like Lisa Page, he figures he can get away with saying whatever he wants, thanks to a cooperative media. For a brief moment, it seemed like the Internet would loosen their stranglehold on the flow of information, but that dream came to an abrupt end when people figured out that free speech invariably results in anti-Semitism. Once the Left saw how easy it was to silence so-called “Nazis”, they obviously had to see how far they could leverage that power, and they have yet to find a limit.
Most recently, it was announced that Google and YouTube have taken down over 300 advertisements by the Trump campaign.
60 Minutes reviewed the archive to learn more about President Trump’s problematic political ads. We found that over 300 video ads were taken down by Google and YouTube, mostly over the summer, for violating company policy. But the archive doesn’t detail what policy was violated. Was it copyright violation? A lie or extreme inaccuracy? Faulty grammar? Bad punctuation? It’s unclear. The ads determined to be offending are not available to be screened. We found very little transparency in the transparency report.
CBS did not seem interested in finding out if any Democrats had similar problems. They probably just operated under the safe assumption that this was a narrowly focused enforcement of real or imagined policy violations, specifically designed to damage the Trump campaign, and posted the story as more of a celebration than as anything resembling news. This is something you might expect from CBS, but I was somewhat surprised to see that PJMedia, TownHall, and Breitbart, all similarly failed to ask this obvious question.
I decided to check for myself, and I found more or less what one would expect. Biden has had no ads removed whatsoever. Warren has had some ads removed, which usually came in spurts, indicating perhaps an effort to run the same violation multiple times before moving on, but nowhere near as many as Trump.
Even if it were done perfectly even, the impact is obvious, and no sane person doubts Google’s intent. The Democrats have the entirety of the media behind them, and do not require digital advertising in the way Trump and other Republicans do.
Google announced an update to their advertising policy last month, which limited the targeting of political advertising. Trump and the Republican Party condemned the policy change, noting the obviousness of the intent.
Twitter, as you’ve surely heard, announced that they would stop selling political ads altogether. Well, not exactly, of course. They just won’t sell ads to political campaigns, PACs, or 501(c)4 groups pursuing legislative or electoral outcomes. If Planned Parenthood wants to flood Twitter with abortion propaganda, and that propaganda links to other material on immigration, that’s perfectly fine with Jack.
Maybe that’s why Jack decided he’s going to spend much of 2020 in Africa.
There’s a lot more to get to, plus your calls at 323-9-AGENDA, that’s 323-924-3632
Join us, this and every Monday and Friday from 5-7pm US Eastern time, for another exciting episode of the Radical Agenda!
The players on this site now have 24/7/365 streaming content!
You can always listen to live Radical Agenda episodes at
This production is made possible by the financial support of listeners and readers like you. I literally cannot do this without you.