The issue of men dressing up as women to sneak into sporting events and gain unearned glory has reached something of a crescendo. It’s one thing to see a high school boy join the girl’s swim team and make a fool of his school administrators, it is quite another to have a man show up to an Olympic boxing match and beat a woman senseless.
As if to drive home the point, Mark Adams, an International Olympic Committee Spokesman, said that we did not want to go back to the “bad old days of sex testing” Olympic athletes.
I fail to recall a time fairly described as old when this was even considered. The idea that you needed to conduct some kind of scientific process to determine if a person was male or female is a pretty new one, and it stems from ideological fanaticism by uninhibited extremists. Until pretty recently, women were women, men were men, and this was all quite uncontroversial. It may have been the case that, from time to time, out of sheer want of glory, some team might try to sneak a man onto a women’s competitive team, but it was at least rather straightforwardly understood that this was cheating and the perpetrators perfectly comprehended that getting caught would be an embarrassment.
It would seem that some portion of our species has evolved out of that useful instinct we call shame. They simply lack anything resembling that sense. In the ongoing Olympic games, not one but two different males got into boxing rings with women, and the unfairness of this has become a subject of some news discussion.
Imane Khelif of Algeria and Lin Yu‑ting of Chinese Taipei (Taiwan) both failed “gender tests” in prior Olympic games. Appropriately, since they are males, they were not permitted to compete against females.
The organization making that decision has since been accused of corruption, and has been replaced by another which permitted this lunacy to move forward.
Whether women should be punching one another in the face as crowds cheer is in itself debatable. Perhaps one can make sense of this otherwise lunatic behavior by calling it collective punishment for our lesser depravities.
Like drugs, one starts at one level and quickly finds themselves in the depths of despair. A few hits off a joint with the kids after school, spirals out of control until one is smoking crack and prostituting themselves while on the run from police.
Men, at some juncture, abandoned their duties. They gave their women whatever they asked for, even when it was not in their interests. “Equality? Sure honey, enjoy it.”
Then, sweetheart, take a big whiff. You are not equal but on your command we shall treat you so nonetheless. Feel free to put those gloves on and step into the ring with a man.
And when, predictably, he beats you so badly that you literally throw in the towel, simply state your next demand, and this too we shall grant.
I predicted long ago that this gender lunacy was the proverbial straw that would, in due course, break the egalitarian camel’s back. Debating feminism long before I had much grasp of the racial question, I was told by a feminist that the racists too believed physical and genetic differences between the races justified segregation and discriminatory policies.
I thought then this was impossible. That would, of course, be entirely sensible, and to my understanding then, racism was born out of irrational prejudices and ignorance. Were it the case that blacks and whites had the sort of differences observable between men and women, then quite obviously this would have to be considered in public policy, hiring decisions, and social science.
I came to know later that this was, indeed, the case. That a biological chasm exists between blacks and whites which makes the differences between the sexes seem slight by comparison. Two entirely different types of creature, sharing in common enough to interbreed, but by no means could they be described as equals by anyone who had observed so much as one day of their respective lives.
Those who most vigorously deny the existence of any force they cannot control, most notably God, purport to know the origins of the universe. They purport to believe that Darwin’s theory of evolution explains all that there is, and yet reject the notion that biological organisms sharing in common a climatic condition and gene pool, will in any number of years evolve differently than similar organisms inhabiting a different climate and sharing a different gene pool. Sure the African sun made the black man black, sure it made his hair different, but safely within his skull resides the mind untouched by his circumstances, we are told.
This has always been too preposterous for the thinking man to believe. Thus we have created a global education system to prevent men from thinking. And yet here we are, as a woman flees a man in a combat sport begging for mercy, the referee complains of bigotry, and the folks at home look on from their televisions in horror at the absurdity of it.
One can hope that this overestimation the Left has made of their own power will serve to finally drive home the point. Faced with the inescapable realities of the human condition, the average non-thinker sees that it is wrong for a man to beat a woman, whatever his attire. He is called a Nazi for the observation, and is left to wonder if the Nazis are so bad after all.
If we can get people to see that segregating sports by sex is obviously just, then perhaps we can also make sense of the “Negro Leagues” which once preserved the integrity of European athletic competitions. If we can segregate our sports, perhaps next our water fountains, and from there, it is just a hope skip and a jump, to the sanity of segregated continents.
Much more to get to, plus your calls at 217-688-1433
I’ll have much more to say about this, and plenty more, when Radical Agenda airs live, this and every Friday at 9:30pm US Eastern on Odysee, and on the GetMeRadio app for smartphone, Roku, and FireTV.
If you would like to help finance my quality productions, I try to make this easy enough to do….
- You can become a paying subscriber to SurrealPolitiks for $10/month and enjoy exclusive subscriber benefits.
- Cash App $EdgyChris
- Strike Payments https://Strike.me/cantwell
- I have a GiveSendGo campaign seeking to raise $5k/month to fund SurrealPolitiks. I’m well short of that goal.
- You can send me checks, cash, money orders, etc… at
- Christopher Cantwell
497 Hooksett Road
Unit 312
Manchester, NH 03104
- Christopher Cantwell
- Cryptocurrency
- Bitcoin: bc1qcg97hwdy8d463794wm0uq3np0px49acw6505gm
- Ethereum: 0xa29441bF858c529E374960A34e16f21abc0970E8
- Litecoin: LQsN4hA761RPrUNTva58nQhJ4BYsAQgYet
- Bitcoin Cash: qplamajpkvhp2g53q4thnu4cakf882er4ge9pqvfdu
- Monero: 46Li94X1o95GaKPxMdsqds3FPJmc2tTvQi3zSuLHbttWTMLbtV9jHGU86wxqvKyVBVRUGhY78uA1HJ5aQn53zc7uRinB96q
- ZCash: t1cXJJsnohToMTukCNXBkcqNPDdwvwnfS3p
- Dash: Xu957ZZqY6ciMZKdUmu5vVUmyxu4jMWEto
- I’ll take other types not listed, just send me an email and I’ll get you a key.
- Though money is preferred, I also have an Amazon wishlist, and some helpful information about gifting.
Follow me elsewhere, listen, watch, and keep in touch…
- Chris on Odysee
- Entropy Live Video and tipping.
- Chris on Twitter
- Chris on Telegram
- ChristopherCantwell.net Newsletter
- Radical Agenda on Fountain.fm Podcasts (Recommended)
- Radical Agenda RSS
- Chris on Gab
- Chris on BitChute
- SurrealPolitiks on Rumble
- SurrealPolitiks Newsletter
- SurrealPolitiks on Telegram
- Radical Agenda on Podcast Addict
- SurrealPolitiks on Fountain
- SurrealPolitiks on Podcast Addict
- SurrealPolitiks RSS
- Chris on Truth Social
- Chris on Gettr
- Chris on Substack
- Chris on Locals
- Chris on DLive
Be sure and get subscribed to my newsletter if you haven’t already, and whitelist [email protected] and [email protected] so I don’t end up in your spam trap!
[newsletter_form]
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.